Why the study?
Are there sex-related differences in right ventricular function in patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy?
Are there sex-related differences in right ventricular function in patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy?
In patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy and severe LV systolic dysfunction, women are significantly less likely to have right ventricular systolic dysfunction compared to men.
RV function may be preserved in women but reduced in men with severe LV systolic dysfunction; leaves open sex-specific prognostic implications in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy.
AIM: To evaluate sex-related differences in right ventricular (RV) function, assessed with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, in patients with stable non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy. METHODS: Prospective multicentre study. We included 71 patients (38 men) and 14 healthy volunteers. RESULTS: Mean age was 60.9 ± 12.2 years. Men presented higher levels of haemoglobin and white blood cell counts than women, and performed better in cardiopulmonary stress testing. A total of 24 patients (12 women) presented severe left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction, 32 (13 female) moderate and 15 (8 women) mild LV systolic dysfunction. In the group with severe LV systolic dysfunction, average right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) was normal in women (52 ± 4 %), whereas it was reduced in men (39 ± 3 %) p = 0.035. Only one woman (8 %) had severe RV systolic dysfunction (RVEF < 35 %) compared with 6 men (50 %) p < 0.001. In patients with moderate and mild LV dysfunction , the mean RVEF was normal in both men and women. In the 14 healthy volunteers, the lowest value of RVEF was 48 % and mean RVEF was normal in women (56 ± 2 %) and in men (51 ± 1 %), p = 0.08. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, RV systolic dysfunction is found mainly in male patients with severe LV systolic dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martínez‐Sellés et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: