Population
11 large-scale cardiac electrophysiology solvers/computational models
Comparison
Various algorithms for cardiac… vs Comparison among different numerical…
Design
Other
Authors
Loading...
Requires caution interpreting results from mass lumping plus operator splitting; leaves open optimal solver standardization for cardiac models.
This study identifies the mathematical techniques (mass lumping and operator splitting) responsible for variability and numerical errors in cardiac electrophysiology simulations.
Pathmanathan et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: