Why the study?
Does FIESTA-ET improve imaging efficiency and quality compared to conventional FIESTA in cardiac MRI?
Does FIESTA-ET improve imaging efficiency and quality compared to conventional FIESTA in cardiac MRI?
FIESTA-ET provides high-resolution cardiac cine MRI with half the acquisition time and improved SNR compared to conventional FIESTA.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
FIESTA-ET may shorten cardiac cine acquisitions with higher SNR; leaves open diagnostic accuracy gains in routine practice.
This work describes a technique that combines multishot echo-planar imaging (EPI) with steady-state free precession (SSFP, also known as TrueFISP, FIESTA, and balanced FFE) for multislice, cine MR imaging of the heart. Unlike recently reported methods, the technique presented here (FIESTA-ET) is high-resolution and does not require offline reconstruction or postprocessing. It is therefore suitable for use on standard clinical scanners. FIESTA-ET was compared with conventional FIESTA imaging in 10 volunteers and quantitative analyses of myocardial signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) and ventricular volumes were performed. While providing comparable image quality, FIESTA-ET required half the acquisition time per slice of conventional FIESTA. Because multiple slices could be imaged in a single breathhold, the entire heart could be scanned in less than 2 min. Although the FIESTA-ET images exhibited an unexpected increase (P < 0.0005) in myocardial SNR of 16% over FIESTA, the volumetric measurements showed excellent correlation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Slavin et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: