Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article contends that scholarship itself has become a barrier to the understanding of church and state relations in Europe. It argues that legal analysis to date has taken an overly narrow approach, focussing purely on the means by which religion is recognised and ignoring the end. The first part of the article elucidates and critiques the three models conventionally elucidated by lawyers (the state church systems, separation (secular) systems and hybrid or cooperationist systems), concluding that an alternative approach is required. The second part outlines an alternative interdisciplinary approach, suggesting the benefits of fusing insights from both law and sociology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Russell Sandberg (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: