Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper attempts three things. It invites you to engage critically with me in the adjudication of a particular controversy. It attempts to argue for and exemplify important procedures which distinguish good and bad thinking in a critical mode. And it argues the case for the separate teaching of critical thinking (henceforth CT).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Victor Quinn (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: