Why the study?
Does catecholamine provocation induce microvoltage T wave alternans at lower heart rates in patients with Long QT Syndrome compared to controls?
Does catecholamine provocation induce microvoltage T wave alternans at lower heart rates in patients with Long QT Syndrome compared to controls?
While catecholamine-provoked microvoltage T wave alternans occurs at lower heart rates in LQTS patients than controls, it does not reliably identify high-risk subjects such as those with prior cardiac arrest.
MicroV-TWA at lower HR does not identify high-risk LQTS patients; leaves open its diagnostic utility in case-control settings.
Macrovoltage T wave alternans (TWA) has been described in congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS). Microvoltage T wave alternans (microV-TWA) at low heart rate (HR) is a marker of arrhythmogenic risk in many conditions, but its significance in LQTS has not been established. Twenty-three genotypically heterogeneous patients with LQTS and 16 control subjects were studied at rest and during phenylephrine and dobutamine provocation. Genotyping was established by PCR amplification and DNA sequencing of the three most common LQTS genes; KCNQ1/KVLQT1 (LQT1), KCNH2/HERG (LQT2), and SCN5A (LQT3). microV-TWA was determined using Fast Fourier transform. Precluded by ectopy, microV-TWA could not be assessed in 8 of 23 patients with LQTS. In the remaining 15 patients with LQTS, microV-TWA occurred at lower HR in LQTS than in controls (117 +/- 49 vs 153 +/- 37 beats/min; P < 0.05). Patients with LQTS developed microV-TWA at HR < 150 beats/min more often than controls (10/15 vs 2/16; P = 0.003). However, microV-TWA was not detected in the 3 individuals with a history of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest including a 14-year-old male with an F339del-KVLQT1 mutation (LQT1) who had dobutamine-provoked polymorphic ventricular tachycardia requiring external defibrillation. Catecholamine-provoked microV-TWA occurs at lower HR in patients with LQTS than in healthy people but does not identify high risk subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Němec et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: