Why the study?
Does varying pacing rate affect regional and global myocardial blood flow in patients with atrial or right ventricular apical pacing?
Does varying pacing rate affect regional and global myocardial blood flow in patients with atrial or right ventricular apical pacing?
Higher pacing rates increase global myocardial blood flow, but right ventricular apical pacing uniquely increases the septal to lateral blood flow ratio at higher rates, which may help explain preserved LV function in some long-term paced patients.
Higher pacing rates may augment global MBF; extends observations on site-specific regional effects but remains hypothesis-generating.
BACKGROUND: Information is scarce on the effects of right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing on regional and global myocardial blood flow (MBF). The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between pacing rate and both regional and global MBF. METHODS: Four patients with exclusive atrial pacing and six patients with exclusive RVA pacing underwent three consecutive H(2) (15)O positron emission tomography scans at 60, 90, and 130 pulses per minute (ppm). For each pacing rate, regional and global MBF was determined. In all patients, the left ventricular (LV) function was normal. RESULTS: By varying the atrial pacing rate from 60 to 130 ppm, the mean global MBF increased from 0.94 to 1.40 mL/g/min, whereas the mean septal to lateral MBF ratio decreased from 1.09 to 0.83. In ventricular-paced patients at corresponding rates, the mean global MBF also increased from 1.07 to 1.52 mL/g/min but here the mean septal to lateral MBF ratio increased from 0.83 to 1.0. CONCLUSIONS: During both acute atrial and RVA pacing, regional and global MBF increases with higher pacing rates. However, the septal to lateral MBF ratio decreases with atrial pacing and increases with RVA pacing in patients with normal LV function. In RVA pacing, these different rate-dependent effects on regional MBF can be considered as a favorable factor that helps to understand why in some long-term paced patients, LV function is preserved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cate et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: