Since there can be no language that is free of our moral and political values, it is difficult, if not impossible, for public administrators and those of us who study and teach them to be “ethically neutral.” However, the idea of neutrality, thought of in terms of “fairness,” or a willingness to “hear the other side,” remains a value that is worthwhile for public administrators to pursue. The implications of this argument for American constitutionalism and public administration practice and education are examined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael W. Spicer (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: