Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 17, 2026Administrative Theory & Praxis

The unintended consequences of using crisis discourse in school board deliberation to ban Critical Race Theory

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

DCDaniel ChoiSJSally Jarvis-Lubbe

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Choi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aabb6725f706d05830e4e39https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2026.2727049
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Challenging the dominant narratives: faculty members’ perceptions of administrators’ responses to Critical Race Theory bans2024 · 12 citations
  2. 2The discursive tactics of perpetuating white normativity in public education: A critical policy discourse analysis of anti-CRT policies across 18 states2025 · 2 citations
  3. 3A Content Analysis Investigating the Framing of Anti-CRT Laws and Their Impacts on Social Studies Teacher Agency2025
  4. 4Policy opinions regarding the teaching of Critical Race Theory in schools2024
  5. 5Critical Race Theory: How Policy Language Differentially Engages Symbolic Racism and Partisanship2024 · 6 citations