Key result
Integrated health care significantly reduced systolic blood pressure (MD -6.26) and HbA1c (MD -0.57) compared to control in patients with hypertension or diabetes.
Why the study?
There is no consensus regarding the effect of integrated health care in patients with hypertension or diabetes.
Does integrated health care improve SBP, DBP, BMI, and HbA1c in patients with hypertension or diabetes?
Meta-Analysis (n=5,231)
Does integrated health care improve SBP, DBP, BMI, and HbA1c in patients with hypertension or diabetes?
Mean Difference: -6.26 (95% CI -10.5–-2.02)
p-value: p=0.004
Integrated health care, particularly group- and disease-specific models, significantly improves blood pressure and glycemic control in patients with hypertension or diabetes.
Supports integrated care models for hypertension and diabetes; reinforces randomized evidence for improved control.
BACKGROUND: A growing number of studies show that integrated health care provides comprehensive and continuous care to patients with hypertension or diabetes. However, there is still no consensus about the effect of integrated health care on patients with hypertension or diabetes. The objective of this study was to verify the effectiveness of integrated health care for patients with hypertension or diabetes by using a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: The study searched multiple English and Chinese electronic databases. The search period was from database inception to 31 October 2020. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were conducted after assessing the risk of bias of each study. RESULTS: Sixteen studies that involved 5231 patients were included in this study. The results of the systematic review revealed that systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), body mass index (BMI) and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) are commonly used indicators for patients with hypertension or diabetes. Individual models and group- and disease-specific models are the most commonly used models of integrated health care. All the studies were from high-income and middle-income countries. Meta-analysis showed that integrated health care significantly improved SBP, DBP and HbA1c but not BMI. A comparison of interventions lasting 6 and 12 months for diabetes was conducted, and HbA1c was decreased after 12 months. The changes in SBP and DBP were statistically significant after using group- and disease-specific model but not individual models. HbA1c was significantly improved after using group- and disease-specific models and individual models. CONCLUSION: Integrated health care is a useful tool for disease management, and individual models and group- and disease-specific models are the most commonly used models in integrated health care. Group- and disease-specific models are more effective than individual models in the disease management of hypertension patients. The duration of intervention should be considered in the disease management of patients with diabetes, and interventions longer than 12 months are recommended. The income level may affect the model of integrated health care in selecting which disease to intervene, but this point still needs support from more studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Hypertension or diabetes (n=5,231). Integrated health care vs. Usual care / Control was evaluated on Systolic blood pressure (SBP) (MD -6.26, 95% CI -10.50 to -2.02, p=0.004). Integrated health care significantly reduced systolic blood pressure (MD -6.26) and HbA1c (MD -0.57) compared to control in patients with hypertension or diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: