Key result
Routine patient-reported outcome tools improve disease progression monitoring and quality of life in chronic heart failure.
Why the study?
Heart failure treatment assessment focuses heavily on mortality and hospitalizations rather than symptoms, leaving few drugs available primarily for symptomatic effect despite persistent symptoms impairing quality of life.
Does the integration of patient-reported outcomes for symptom assessment improve the monitoring and management of symptoms in patients with chronic heart failure?
Does the integration of patient-reported outcomes for symptom assessment improve the monitoring and management of symptoms in patients with chronic heart failure?
Prioritizing formal symptom assessment using patient-reported outcome measures in routine heart failure clinics can help address persistent symptom burden and potentially improve patients' quality of life.
May support PRO integration for HF symptom monitoring; leaves open need for RCTs to confirm benefits.
Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a chronic, progressive disease that has detrimental consequences on a patient's quality of life (QoL). In part due to requirements for market access and licensing, the assessment of current and future treatments focuses on reducing mortality and hospitalizations. Few drugs are available principally for their symptomatic effect despite the fact that most patients' symptoms persist or worsen over time and an acceptance that the survival gains of modern therapies are mitigated by poorly controlled symptoms. Additional contributors to the failure to focus on symptoms could be the result of under-reporting of symptoms by patients and carers and a reliance on insensitive symptomatic categories in which patients frequently remain despite additional therapies. Hence, formal symptom assessment tools, such as questionnaires, can be useful prompts to encourage more fidelity and reproducibility in the assessment of symptoms. This scoping review explores for the first time the assessment options and management of common symptoms in CHF with a focus on patient-reported outcome tools. The integration of patient-reported outcomes for symptom assessment into the routine of a CHF clinic could improve the monitoring of disease progression and QoL, especially following changes in treatment or intervention with a targeted symptom approach expected to improve QoL and patient outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koshy et al. (2020) conducted a review in Chronic heart failure (CHF). Patient-reported outcome tools (PROs) was evaluated. Patient-reported outcome tools for comprehensive symptom assessment in routine chronic heart failure clinics can improve the monitoring of disease progression and quality of life.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: