Key result
Using a fixed cutoff of 0.03 to 0.05 ng/mL increased the concordance between point-of-care contemporary and high-sensitivity troponin I assays from 80-90% to 90-95%.
Why the study?
Do contemporary point-of-care and central laboratory troponin I assays show analytical concordance with high-sensitivity troponin I assays in coronary care unit inpatients?
Population
102 inpatients in the coronary care unit
Comparison
3 point-of-care and 1 central laboratory… vs Abbott high-sensitivity (hs) cTnI assay
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
Uniform troponin cutoff may enhance POC-hs-cTnI concordance in CCU inpatients; hypothesis-generating for outcomes, needs prospective validation.
Cross-Sectional (n=102)
Do contemporary point-of-care and central laboratory troponin I assays show analytical concordance with high-sensitivity troponin I assays in coronary care unit inpatients?
A single clinical decision limit for troponin I (0.03-0.05 ng/mL) improves diagnostic concordance across diverse assays compared to assay-specific 99th percentile cutoffs.
Tsui et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Inpatients in the coronary care unit (n=102). Point-of-care and central laboratory contemporary cTnI assays vs. Abbott high-sensitivity (hs) cTnI assay was evaluated on Analytical concordance between contemporary cTnI assays and hs-cTnI assay. Using a fixed cutoff of 0.03 to 0.05 ng/mL increased the concordance between point-of-care contemporary and high-sensitivity troponin I assays from 80-90% to 90-95%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: