Key result
A detailed clinical and imaging evaluation is required to differentiate arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy from its phenocopies and other genetic or non-genetic heart muscle diseases.
Why the study?
The identification of biventricular and left-dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy variants has expanded the spectrum of phenocopies, making differential diagnosis more difficult and requiring targeted evaluation to confirm a conclusive diagnosis.
Provides a review of clinical and imaging features to aid in the differential diagnosis of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy from its phenocopies.
Supports refined ACM differential diagnosis in practice; leaves open prospective validation of imaging criteria.
Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is a genetic heart muscle disease caused by mutations of desmosomal genes in about 50% of patients. Affected patients may have defective non-desmosomal genes. The ACM phenotype may occur in other genetic cardiomyopathies, cardio-cutaneous syndromes or neuromuscular disorders. A sizeable proportion of patients have non-genetic diseases with clinical features resembling ACM (phenocopies). The identification of biventricular and left-dominant phenotypic variants has made differential diagnosis more difficult because of the broader spectrum of phenocopies which requires a detailed clinical study with appropriate evaluation of most prominent and discriminatory disease features. Conditions that enter into differential diagnosis of ACM include heart muscle diseases affecting the right ventricle, the left ventricle, or both. To confirm a conclusive diagnosis of ACM, these differential possibilities need to be reasonably excluded by an accurate and targeted clinical evaluation. This article reviews the clinical and imaging features of major phenocopies of ACM and provides indications for differential diagnosis. The recent etiologic classification of Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathies, whose common denominator is the distinctive phenotype characterized by a hypokinetic and non-dilated ventricle with a large amount of myocardial fibrosis underlying its propensity to generate ventricular arrhythmias is also addressed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cipriani et al. (2021) conducted a review in Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM). A detailed clinical and imaging evaluation is required to differentiate arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy from its phenocopies and other genetic or non-genetic heart muscle diseases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: