Key result
Black patients receive ~18% greater initial antihypertensive treatment intensity than White patients.
Why the study?
It remained unclear whether sex, race, and ethnicity disparities in hypertension treatment intensity occur at treatment onset and whether clinical factors explain them.
Does initial antihypertensive treatment intensity differ by sex, race, and ethnicity in newly treated patients with hypertension?
Cross-Sectional (n=4,094)
Yes
Does initial antihypertensive treatment intensity differ by sex, race, and ethnicity in newly treated patients with hypertension?
Effect estimate: 17.9% greater TTIS (Black vs White, adjusted) (95% CI 13.8-21.9)
Significant disparities exist in initial antihypertensive treatment intensity, with men and Black individuals receiving more intensive therapy than women and White individuals, respectively, independent of clinical factors.
Racial and sex disparities in initial antihypertensive intensity highlight potential inequities; cross-sectional data leave mechanisms and practice implications open.
BACKGROUND: Sex, race, and ethnicity disparities in hypertension (HTN) treatment intensity have been previously described. It remains unclear if these disparities occur at treatment onset and whether they can be explained by differences in clinical factors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of adults with newly treated HTN using linked EHR + claims data from OneFlorida + Consortium. We included Florida Medicaid & Medicare-recipients diagnosed with HTN and prescribed ≥ 1 first-line antihypertensive during 2013-2020. We used generalized linear models to estimate differences in total therapeutic intensity score (TTIS)-a patient's total daily dose (TDD) divided by recommended maximum TDD for a drug, summed across entire regimen-by sex, race, and ethnicity. We then modeled the same, controlling for demographics, blood pressure, and relevant comorbidities. RESULTS: In total 4,094 patients (mean age 58 ± 16; female 57.6%; White 56.7%) were included. We observed variations in the initiation of antihypertensive classes by sex, race and ethnicity. In univariate analyses, men averaged 7.6% (95% CI: 3.9%-11.3%) greater TTIS versus women and Black individuals averaged 10.5% (95% CI: 6.6%-14.3%) greater TTIS versus White individuals, whereas no disparities were observed by ethnicity. After adjusting for clinical factors, these disparities persisted: men had 7.6% (95% CI: 3.9%-11.4%) greater TTIS versus women, and Black individuals had 17.9% (95% CI: 13.8%-21.9%) greater TTIS versus White individuals. CONCLUSIONS: We observed disparities in treatment intensity by sex and race that were not explained by differences in clinical factors. There was sex-based variation in practice patterns, and Black individuals received more intensive initial antihypertensive therapy than White individuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keshwani et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in hypertension (n=4,094). Male sex and Black race vs. Female sex and White race was evaluated on Total therapeutic intensity score (TTIS) (17.9% greater TTIS (Black vs White, adjusted), 95% CI 13.8-21.9). Black patients received 17.9% (95% CI 13.8-21.9%) greater initial antihypertensive treatment intensity than White patients, and men received 7.6% (95% CI 3.9-11.4%) greater intensity than women.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: