Key result
A 6-month complex lifestyle intervention significantly reduced body weight by a mean of 2.8 kg in inactive older adults with obesity, but did not significantly increase physical activity levels.
Why the study?
Long-term maintenance of favorable lifestyle changes remains a key challenge in lifestyle interventions targeting middle-aged and older adults.
Does a 6-month complex lifestyle intervention improve adiposity, physical activity, and cardiometabolic risk factors in inactive older adults with obesity and elevated cardiovascular risk?
Does a 6-month complex lifestyle intervention improve adiposity, physical activity, and cardiometabolic risk factors in inactive older adults with obesity and elevated cardiovascular risk?
Mean Difference: -2.8 (95% CI -4.92–-0.68)
Absolute Event Rate: 103.4% vs 106.2%
p-value: p=0.0135
A 6-month complex lifestyle intervention in older adults with obesity successfully reduced adiposity but did not significantly alter physical activity levels or cardiometabolic risk factors.
May reduce adiposity without activity gains in older obese adults; leaves open optimized interventions for cardiometabolic benefit.
A key challenge in lifestyle interventions is long-term maintenance of favorable lifestyle changes. Middle-aged and older adults are important target groups. The purpose of this analysis was to investigate changes in adiposity, physical activity, cardiometabolic risk factors, diet, physical capacity, and well-being, in inactive middle-aged and older women and men with obesity and elevated cardiovascular disease risk, participating in an interdisciplinary single-arm complex lifestyle intervention pilot study. Participants were recruited from the population-based Tromsø Study 2015-2016 with inclusion criteria age 55-74 years, body mass index (BMI) ≥30kg/m2, sedentary lifestyle, no prior myocardial infarction and elevated cardiovascular risk. Participants (11 men and 5 women aged 57-74 years) underwent a 6-month intervention of two 1-hour group-sessions per week with instructor-led gradually intensified exercise (endurance and strength), one individual and three 2-hour group counselling sessions with nutritionist (Nordic Nutrition Recommendations) and psychologist (Implementation intention strategies). We investigated changes in adiposity (weight, BMI, body composition, waist circumference), physical activity (self-reported and via physical activity trackers), cardiometabolic risk factors (blood pressure, HbA1c, blood lipids), diet (intake of energy, nutrients, foods), physical capacity (aerobic capacity, muscle strength), and psychological well-being, measured at baseline and end-of-intervention, using mean-comparison paired t-tests. Further, we investigated self-reported healthy lifestyle maintenance six months after end-of-intervention, and monthly changes in daily step count, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and total energy expenditure. From baseline to end-of-intervention, there was a mean decrease in weight, BMI, fat mass, waist circumference, intake of total- and saturated fat, and increase in lean mass, lateral pulldown and leg press. We detected no changes in mean levels of physical activity, cardiometabolic risk factors or well-being. Six months after end-of-intervention, 25% responded healthy lifestyle achievement and maintenance, while objectively measured physical activity remained unchanged. The results are useful for development of a protocol for a full-scale trial. Trial registration: The study was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov registry (NCT03807323).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hopstock et al. (2021) studied Obesity and elevated cardiovascular risk (n=16). Complex lifestyle intervention vs. Baseline was evaluated on Change in body weight from baseline to end-of-intervention (MD -2.8 kg, 95% CI -4.92, -0.68, p=0.0135). A 6-month complex lifestyle intervention significantly reduced body weight by a mean of 2.8 kg in inactive older adults with obesity, but did not significantly increase physical activity levels.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: