Key result
Natriuretic peptide-guided treatment of heart failure significantly reduced all-cause mortality compared to clinically guided care (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.45-0.86; P=0.004).
Why the study?
Does natriuretic peptide-guided treatment reduce all-cause mortality in patients with chronic heart failure?
Population
2000 patients with chronic heart failure from 11 eligible randomized clinical trials
Comparison
Natriuretic peptide-guided treatment of heart… vs Standard clinically guided care
Design
Meta-analysis, Randomized clinical trials
Authors
Loading...
Supports natriuretic peptide-guided therapy to reduce mortality in chronic HF; confirms benefit across randomized trials.
Meta-Analysis (n=2,000)
Yes
Does natriuretic peptide-guided treatment reduce all-cause mortality in patients with chronic heart failure?
Hazard Ratio: 0.62 (95% CI 0.45–0.86)
p-value: p=0.004
Natriuretic peptide-guided treatment of heart failure reduces all-cause mortality in patients aged <75 years and overall reduces heart failure and cardiovascular hospitalizations.
Troughton et al. (2014) conducted a meta-analysis in chronic heart failure (n=2,000). Natriuretic peptide-guided treatment vs. standard clinically guided care was evaluated on all-cause mortality (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.86, p=0.004). Natriuretic peptide-guided treatment of heart failure significantly reduced all-cause mortality compared to clinically guided care (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.45-0.86; P=0.004).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: