Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Because virtually all published research on the effect of a monetary gratuity has been in the context of public opinion polling or market research by sampling nonprofessional populations, a randomized experiment was conducted in a mail survey of 507 professional school and public librarians. A random half (Group E) had $1.00 attached as a small token of appreciation for their cooperation. The conventional questionnaire methodology was employed for Group C. In the initial mailing, the gratuity had a powerful influence on the rate of return—80% vs. 59%. Indeed, the response rate with the gratuity for the first mailing (80%) was higher than that obtained for Group C with two mailings (74%). (No gratuity was included for either group in the second mailing.) The return rate for Group E increased to 86% following the second mailing, an unusually high return rate for a mail survey even among professional populations. Even though professional populations typically have much higher response rates than the general population, a $1.00 gratuity can have a substantial effect on increasing the return rate and, consequently, can strengthen the external validity of survey findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hopkins et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: