Key result
A 1.5 T cMRI scan in patients implanted with the Accent MRI conditional pacing system was safe, demonstrating 100% freedom from MRI scan-related complications and no significant device changes.
Why the study?
Does a 1.5 Tesla cardiac MRI scan cause complications or alter device performance in patients implanted with an MRI conditional dual-chamber pacing system?
RCT (n=283)
randomized
Yes
Does a 1.5 Tesla cardiac MRI scan cause complications or alter device performance in patients implanted with an MRI conditional dual-chamber pacing system?
Cardiac MRI at 1.5 Tesla is safe and does not adversely affect device electrical parameters in patients implanted with this specific MRI conditional pacing system.
Supports safe 1.5 T cMRI in patients with the Accent MRI conditional system; confirms device stability in this RCT.
BACKGROUND: Utilization of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) as an imaging modality in clinical practice is rapidly increasing. More evidence from randomized studies establishing clinical safety and performance of pacing systems in patients undergoing a cMRI scan is needed. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this prospective, multicenter, randomized study was to demonstrate safety and efficacy of the Accent MRI™ conditional pacing systems (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) in patients undergoing cMRI scan. METHODS: Patients (n = 283) indicated for dual-chamber pacemaker implant were randomized to either the MRI Group (MG) (n = 140) or the Control Group (CG) (n = 143) after successful device implantation of the Accent MRI™ system. Clinical evaluation and device interrogation were performed at pre- and post-MRI scan, and 1 month post-MRI for all patients. At 9-12 weeks postimplant, patients in MG underwent a nondiagnostic cMRI scan at 1.5 Tesla (T), while patients in CG underwent device interrogation and clinical evaluation twice with a 45-minute waiting period in between. The safety endpoint was freedom from MRI scan-related complications and that for efficacy was significant changes in right atrial/ventricular capture threshold and sensing amplitude between right before MRI, immediately after MRI, and 1 month post-MRI. RESULTS: Results showed 100% freedom from MRI scan-related complications. There were no significant changes in device performance between pre-MRI scan and 1 month post-MRI scan time points in both study groups. CONCLUSIONS: cMRI scanning with 1.5 T scanners is safe in patients implanted with the Accent MRI™ conditional pacing system and has no significant effect on the electrical parameters of the device and leads.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ching et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Indication for dual-chamber pacemaker implant (n=283). Nondiagnostic cMRI scan at 1.5 Tesla vs. Device interrogation and clinical evaluation twice with a 45-minute waiting period was evaluated on Freedom from MRI scan-related complications and significant changes in right atrial/ventricular capture threshold and sensing amplitude. A 1.5 T cMRI scan in patients implanted with the Accent MRI conditional pacing system was safe, demonstrating 100% freedom from MRI scan-related complications and no significant device changes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: