Key result
mHealth app self-management reduces SBP by ~6 mm Hg in hypertensive adults.
Why the study?
Evidence on the effect of mHealth app interventions on self-management in patients with hypertension needed updating, and the active ingredients promoting behavior change remained unclear.
Do self-management interventions based on mHealth apps reduce blood pressure in adults with hypertension?
Meta-Analysis
Do self-management interventions based on mHealth apps reduce blood pressure in adults with hypertension?
Mean Difference: -5.78 (95% CI -7.97–-3.59)
p-value: p=<.001
Self-management interventions using mHealth apps significantly reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure in adults with hypertension, with greater efficacy observed in interventions utilizing 11 or more behavior change techniques.
Supports mHealth app integration into hypertension care; confirms self-management efficacy and extends evidence for app-based interventions.
BACKGROUND Hypertension has become an important global public health challenge. Mobile health (mHealth) intervention is a viable strategy to improve outcomes for patients with hypertension. However, evidence on the effect of mHealth app interventions on self-management in patients with hypertension is yet to be updated, and the active ingredients promoting behavior change in interventions remain unclear. OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate the effect of mHealth app self-management interventions on blood pressure (BP) management and investigate the use of behavior change techniques (BCTs) in mHealth app interventions. METHODS We conducted a literature search in 6 electronic databases from January 2009 to October 2023 for studies reporting the application of mHealth apps in self-management interventions. The Cochrane Risk of Bias (version 2) tool for randomized controlled trials was used to assess the quality of the studies. BCTs were coded according to the Taxonomy of BCTs (version 1). The extracted data were analyzed using RevMan5.4 software (Cochrane Collaboration). RESULTS We reviewed 20 studies, of which 16 were included in the meta-analysis. In total, 21 different BCTs (mean 8.7, SD 3.8 BCTs) from 12 BCT categories were reported in mHealth app interventions. The most common BCTs were self-monitoring of outcomes of behavior, feedback on outcomes of behavior, instruction on how to perform the behavior, and pharmacological support. The mHealth app interventions resulted in a –5.78 mm Hg (95% CI –7.97 mm Hg to –3.59 mm Hg; P<.001) reduction in systolic BP and a –3.28 mm Hg (95% CI –4.39 mm Hg to –2.17 mm Hg; P<.001) reduction in diastolic BP. The effect of interventions on BP reduction was associated with risk factors, such as hypertension, that were addressed by the mHealth app intervention (multiple risk factors vs a single risk factor: –6.50 mm Hg, 95% CI –9.00 mm Hg to –3.99 mm Hg vs –1.54 mm Hg, 95% CI –4.15 mm Hg to 1.06 mm Hg; P=.007); the presence of a theoretical foundation (with vs without behavior change theory: –10.06 mm Hg, 95% CI –16.42 mm Hg to –3.70 mm Hg vs –4.13 mm Hg, 95% CI –5.50 to –2.75 mm Hg; P=.07); intervention duration (3 vs ≥6 months: –8.87 mm Hg, 95% CI –10.90 mm Hg to –6.83 mm Hg vs –5.76 mm Hg, 95% CI –8.74 mm Hg to –2.77 mm Hg; P=.09); and the number of BCTs (≥11 vs <11 BCTs: –9.68 mm Hg, 95% CI –13.49 mm Hg to –5.87 mm Hg vs –2.88 mm Hg, 95% CI –3.90 mm Hg to –1.86 mm Hg; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS The self-management interventions based on mHealth apps were effective strategies for lowering BP in patients with hypertension. The effect of interventions was influenced by factors related to the study’s intervention design and BCT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in Hypertension. mHealth app self-management interventions was evaluated on Systolic blood pressure reduction (MD -5.78 mm Hg, 95% CI -7.97 to -3.59, p=<.001). mHealth app self-management interventions reduced systolic blood pressure by 5.78 mm Hg (95% CI -7.97 to -3.59; P<.001) and diastolic blood pressure by 3.28 mm Hg in adults with hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: