Key result
A continuous-care model significantly increased the mean self-care score in patients with heart failure compared to the control group at three months (51.4 vs 30.8; P<0.001).
Why the study?
Self-care behaviours strongly influence heart failure prognosis, but the effectiveness of a continuous-care pattern on self-care in admitted heart failure patients needed evaluation.
Does a continuous-care model improve self-care scores in patients with heart failure?
RCT (n=72)
Randomly assigned
No
Does a continuous-care model improve self-care scores in patients with heart failure?
Absolute Event Rate: 51.4% vs 30.8%
p-value: p=<0.001
A continuous-care model significantly improves self-care behaviors in patients with chronic heart failure.
Supports routine use of continuous-care models in heart failure; confirms RCT efficacy for self-care improvement.
BACKGROUND: Self-care behaviours are one of the most important determinant factors in the prognosis of heart failure, which can improve the symptoms of the disease, the performance and the reduction of mortality in these patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of continuous-care pattern on self-care in heart failure patients admitted to Shahid Chamran Hospital in Isfahan. METHODS: This quasi-experimental study is implemented on 72 patients with heart failure who are admitted to Shahid Chamran Hospital in Isfahan. The patients are randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups (36 patients in each group). For a period of three months, a continuous-care model is performed, and then, the self-care score of patients with heart failure is compared in both groups at baseline and follow-up assessment. The required data were gathered using a demographic questionnaire and a European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior (EHFSCB). RESULTS: Regarding the implementation of the continuous-care model, the results showed that the mean self-care score before the implementation of the continuous-care model was 28.2 ± 5.02 in the experimental group and 29.5 ± 3.7 in the control group, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.22). However, after implementing continuous-care model, the mean self-care score of the experimental group was 51.4.4 ± 2.8 as compared to the control group (30.8 ± 3.2) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of this study, it can be concluded that the implementation of this care model can lead to an increase in self-care score in patients with chronic heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rezamand et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Heart failure (n=72). Continuous-care model vs. Control group was evaluated on Mean self-care score (p=<0.001). A continuous-care model significantly increased the mean self-care score in patients with heart failure compared to the control group at three months (51.4 vs 30.8; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: