Key result
Pre-existing AF linked to ~100% greater postoperative stroke risk in cardiac surgery patients.
Why the study?
Atrial fibrillation may increase the risk of stroke and death, prompting an evaluation of the association between AF, surgical treatment, and stroke.
Does pre-existing atrial fibrillation increase the risk of stroke in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Meta-Analysis (n=132,208)
Does pre-existing atrial fibrillation increase the risk of stroke in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Odds Ratio: 2 (95% CI 1.7–2.1)
p-value: p=<0.0001
Pre-existing atrial fibrillation is associated with a significantly increased risk of stroke in patients undergoing cardiac surgical interventions.
Supports incorporating pre-existing AF into perioperative stroke risk assessment; leaves open whether targeted interventions improve outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is self-limiting condition, but it may also increase the risk of stroke and death. The association between AF and surgery with stroke was assessed both subjectively and statistically using systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: For data collection, a thorough search was made in PubMed, EMBASE, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library using searching keywords "postoperative ischemic stroke, atrial fibrillation, stroke, cardiac surgery, brain ischemia, and heart surgery". Direct and indirect comparisons were made using random-effect network meta-analysis. RESULTS: 16-studies were identified comprising of 132,208 patient, 64% male, median age > 63 years and follow-up > 1.5 years. Pooling the results from the random-effects model showed odds ratios associated with the risk of stroke of surgical processes (CABG) in patients with AF. The odds ratio OR = 1.1 (0.65-1.54, P < 0.001) and heterogeneity (I2 = 17%, P = 0.13) exposing higher risk of the stroke. Odds ratio (HR 1.5, 0.9-1.71) without heterogeneity showed greater risk of stroke after heart valve surgery in patients with AF. Study 8 didn't show any risk of the stroke after left atrial appendage (LAA) clipping intervention, but the outcomes were biased. A pooled analysis showed odd ratio OR, 2 (1.7-2.1, P < 0.0001), without heterogeneity indicating higher stroke risk in general cardiac surgery. The patients undergone cardiac surgery from three studies with pooled analysis study-5 OR 2 (1.7-2.1, P > 0.001), study-6 OR 1.8 (1.7-1.9, P > 0.001), and study-14 OR 7.8 (6.2-8.1, P > 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The study clearly defines stroke outcomes when they are quantified, however, further research is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Patients undergoing cardiac surgery (n=132,208). Atrial fibrillation vs. No atrial fibrillation at baseline was evaluated on Incidence of stroke (OR 2, 95% CI 1.7-2.1, p=<0.0001). Pre-existing atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing general cardiac surgery was associated with a significantly higher risk of postoperative stroke compared to those without atrial fibrillation (OR 2).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: