Key result
Educational approaches for patients before and after heart surgery had a significant positive effect on clinical, economic, or patient-reported outcomes in 28 of 29 included studies.
Why the study?
Heart surgery patients face mental and physical difficulties after discharge, creating a need to evaluate the applications and effects of pre- and post-operative educational approaches.
Do educational approaches improve clinical, economic, or patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing open-heart surgery?
Systematic Review
Do educational approaches improve clinical, economic, or patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing open-heart surgery?
The use of educational approaches before and after heart surgery can significantly reduce stress and financial burden while increasing the quality of care and patient knowledge.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports integrating educational approaches into perioperative cardiac surgery care; confirms consistent benefits across outcome domains in high-level evidence synthesis.
INTRODUCTION: Patients who undergo heart surgery are exposed to mental and physical difficulties after discharge from hospital. They often need support and follow-up after discharge. The use of educational approaches or solutions before or after heart surgery can increase patients' knowledge on the post-operative complications and self-care. The main purpose of this systematic review is to determine the applications of educational approaches and investigate the effects of these approaches on patients with heart surgery. METHOD AND MATERIEL: A thorough search was conducted in Medline (through PubMed), Scopus, ISI web of science to select related articles published between 2011 and May 2022. All of the retrieved papers were screened according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. RESULTS: A total of 29 articles were obtained from the search, which included in this systematic review after being assessed based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Most of the articles (n = 10, 34.48%) had been conducted in Canada and Iran, with the most significant number published in 2016. Out of 29 studies, 23 were experimental studies, and six were observational-analytical studies. The number of participants in the studies ranged from 11 to 600 (IQR1: 57.5, median: 88, IQR3: 190). In 28 (96.55%) studies, the educational approaches had a significant effect on clinical, economic or patient-reported outcomes. The greatest effect reported by the studies was related to clinical outcomes such as patient care improvement or change in clinical practice. The most effects in the patient-reported outcomes were related to improving patient satisfaction and patient knowledge. In terms of global rating scores, 17.24% of the included studies were considered as weak, 20.68% as moderate, and 62.06% as strong. CONCLUSION: The results of systematic review showed that the use of educational approaches by patients before and after heart surgery can have significant effects on reducing stress and financial burden, and increasing the quality of care and level of knowledge in patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shahmoradi et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review in Heart surgery. Educational approaches and technologies vs. Usual care or no intervention was evaluated on Clinical, economic, or patient-reported outcomes. Educational approaches for patients before and after heart surgery had a significant positive effect on clinical, economic, or patient-reported outcomes in 28 of 29 included studies.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: