Key result
Pharmacist-led iron deficiency clinics are linked to ~$2,500 lower per-patient costs in HF or PH.
Why the study?
To conduct a data-driven cost analysis comparing a clinical pharmacist-led iron deficiency treatment clinic to usual care for patients with heart failure or pulmonary hypertension.
Does a clinical pharmacist-led iron deficiency treatment clinic reduce net costs per patient compared to usual care in patients with heart failure or pulmonary hypertension?
Cohort (n=123)
Does a clinical pharmacist-led iron deficiency treatment clinic reduce net costs per patient compared to usual care in patients with heart failure or pulmonary hypertension?
A clinical pharmacist-led iron deficiency treatment clinic for HF and PH patients is associated with lower net costs per patient compared to usual care, resulting in hospital cost savings.
May support pharmacist-led iron clinics for HF/PH cost savings; leaves open need for RCTs before practice change.
PURPOSE: To conduct a data-driven cost analysis comparing a clinical pharmacist-led iron deficiency treatment clinic to usual care for patients with heart failure (HF) or pulmonary hypertension (PH). METHODS: Direct medical costs for providing services and associated reimbursements over a 19-month period were estimated from the hospital perspective for a group of patients who received iron deficiency treatment in a pharmacist-led clinic and a group that received usual care. The frequency of various services within each group were derived from clinical data of a published cohort study. Unit costs for services were obtained from the literature. The net cost per patient was calculated and compared between groups, with one-way sensitivity analysis conducted on hospitalization and clinical pharmacist personnel costs. All costs were inflated to 2024 US dollar value. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients received clinical pharmacist-led services, and the cost for the services provided was $3,089 per patient, while 42 received usual care, with a cost of $5,547 per patient. The reimbursement per patient was $1,852 in the clinical pharmacist group and $1,798 in the usual care group. The net cost per patient was lower in the clinical pharmacist group by $2,512 than in the usual care group. One-way sensitivity analyses indicated that varying hospitalization costs significantly impacted the net cost in both groups. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that a clinical pharmacist-led service incurred lower net cost per patient than usual care, leading to cost savings for the hospital. Economic analyses can complement clinical studies in demonstrating the sustainability of clinical services.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pathan et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Heart failure or pulmonary hypertension (n=123). Clinical pharmacist-led iron deficiency treatment clinic vs. Usual care was evaluated on Net cost per patient (Difference of $2,512). A clinical pharmacist-led iron deficiency treatment clinic for patients with heart failure or pulmonary hypertension reduced the net cost per patient by $2,512 compared to usual care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: