Key result
Ferric carboxymaltose treatment for iron deficiency in heart failure increased QALYs by 0.050 per patient and reduced per-patient costs by €36 to €484 compared with placebo.
Why the study?
Is ferric carboxymaltose cost-effective compared with placebo for treating iron deficiency in chronic heart failure patients in Nordic countries?
Is ferric carboxymaltose cost-effective compared with placebo for treating iron deficiency in chronic heart failure patients in Nordic countries?
Implementing ESC guidelines for treating iron deficiency in heart failure with ferric carboxymaltose is cost-effective and improves quality of life in Nordic countries.
Cost-saving with QALY gains supports guideline-aligned iron repletion in Nordic HF; extends trial data but leaves adoption open pending real-world confirmation.
OBJECTIVES: Guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommend that ferritin and transferrin saturation should be tested in chronic heart failure (HF) and state that iron treatment with ferric carboxymaltose should be considered in HF patients with iron deficiency to alleviate symptoms and improve exercise tolerance and quality of life. This study evaluates the cost effectiveness of the implementation of this recommendation in four Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden). DESIGN: We performed a cost-utility analysis comparing ferric carboxymaltose treatment with placebo over a one-year time period in each country. Data on healthcare resource use and health outcomes were taken from the CONFIRM-HF study and combined with country-specific unit costs. Differences in per-patient costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated. RESULTS: QALYs were higher (increase of 0.050 QALYs per patient) in the iron-treated group compared with placebo. Per-patient costs were lower in all countries (with reductions ranging from €36 to €484). Fewer hospitalizations were one key driver of these results. Another important driver was how well the new routines for iron treatment can be integrated into the current healthcare management of HF. A sensitivity analysis confirmed the results to be robust. CONCLUSIONS: Iron deficiency therapy in HF with ferric carboxymaltose compared with placebo is estimated to both improve health-related quality of life and save healthcare costs in all Nordic countries. A well-organized healthcare management of HF patients can enable the implementation of ESC-recommended treatment of iron deficiency without need for additional resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hofmarcher et al. (2018) studied chronic heart failure (HF) with iron deficiency. Ferric carboxymaltose vs. Placebo was evaluated on Differences in per-patient costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (increase of 0.050 QALYs per patient). Ferric carboxymaltose treatment for iron deficiency in heart failure increased QALYs by 0.050 per patient and reduced per-patient costs by €36 to €484 compared with placebo.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: