Key result
Vector flow mapping predicts severe pulmonary regurgitation in repaired ToF with AUC 0.93 versus CMR.
Why the study?
Quantitative evaluation of pulmonary valvular regurgitation fraction to guide reintervention in repaired tetralogy of Fallot is commonly performed using CMR, but less commonly using echocardiography.
Does vector flow mapping (VFM) echocardiography accurately quantify pulmonary regurgitation fraction compared to cardiac magnetic resonance in pediatric patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot?
Observational (n=34)
No
Does vector flow mapping (VFM) echocardiography accurately quantify pulmonary regurgitation fraction compared to cardiac magnetic resonance in pediatric patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Vector flow mapping provides an accurate, quantitative echocardiographic alternative to cardiac magnetic resonance for evaluating pulmonary regurgitation severity in pediatric patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot.
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary valvular regurgitation in postoperative patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF) significantly impairs exercise capacity and causes right heart failure. Quantitative evaluation of the pulmonary valvular regurgitation fraction (PRF) by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is commonly used to determine the indication for surgical or catheter interventions, but less commonly using echocardiography. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively investigated the feasibility and validation of vector flow mapping (VFM) for the quantification of PRF (VFM-PRF) in 34 pediatric patients with rTOF, comparing it to CMR-derived PRF (CMR-PRF) and other qualitative or semiquantitative echocardiographic indices. Each predictive value for CMR-PRF ≥40% was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves. VFM-PRF and CMR-PRF showed good agreement, with a correlation coefficient of 0.90 and the highest predictive value for CMR-PRF ≥40%, resulting in an area under the curve of 0.93. Other conventional echocardiographic parameters demonstrated poor predictive accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report to demonstrate the accurate quantification of PRF by echocardiography using VFM in pediatric patients with rTOF, showing good agreement with CMR results. Particularly in children, VFM may be clinically useful in determining the indication for reintervention for pulmonary valve replacement, offering a possible alternative to CMR, which often requires deep sedation and general anesthesia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawamura et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Repaired tetralogy of Fallot with pulmonary regurgitation (n=34). Vector flow mapping (VFM) vs. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was evaluated on Predictive value of VFM-PRF for estimating CMR-PRF ≥ 40% (AUC 0.93, 95% CI 0.77-0.99, p=<0.001). Vector flow mapping accurately quantified pulmonary regurgitation in pediatric patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot, showing an AUC of 0.93 for predicting severe regurgitation compared to CMR.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: