Velocity-encoded cine MR imaging demonstrated high interstudy reproducibility (r > 0.97) for quantifying regurgitant volume and fraction in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation.
Observational (n=10)
Does velocity-encoded cine MR imaging provide reproducible and accurate measurements of regurgitant volume and fraction in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation?
Velocity-encoded cine MR imaging is highly accurate and reproducible for quantifying regurgitant volume and fraction in chronic aortic regurgitation, supporting its potential for serial monitoring.
Effect estimate: r > 0.97
The interstudy reproducibility of velocity-encoded cine (VEC) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for quantification of regurgitant volume (RV) and regurgitant fraction (RF) was studied in 10 patients with chronic aortic regurgitation. Each patient underwent two VEC MR imaging studies. RV and RF were measured on the aortic flow curve by quantifying antegrade and retrograde flow per cardiac cycle. VEC MR imaging measurements for RV and RF correlated closely with volumetric measurements for both studies (r greater than .97). Interstudy reproducibility for VEC MR imaging measurement of RV and RF was high (r greater than .97), and the interstudy variability for VEC MR imaging measurements was low. These results demonstrate a high accuracy of VEC MR imaging for measurement of RV and RF in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation. The level of interstudy reproducibility of VEC MR imaging for quantitative assessment of RV and RF indicates the potential of this technique for follow-up and monitoring of response to therapy.
Dulce et al. (Thu,) conducted a observational in Chronic aortic regurgitation (n=10). Velocity-encoded cine (VEC) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging vs. Volumetric measurements was evaluated on Interstudy reproducibility and correlation with volumetric measurements for regurgitant volume (RV) and regurgitant fraction (RF) (r > 0.97). Velocity-encoded cine MR imaging demonstrated high interstudy reproducibility (r > 0.97) for quantifying regurgitant volume and fraction in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: