Key result
Normal waist circumference without obesity is linked to ~42% less diabetic retinopathy versus excess abdominal fat.
Why the study?
Type 2 diabetes has heterogeneous clinical phenotypes related to different risks of complications, prompting evaluation of the correlation between generalized and abdominal adiposity and micro- and macrovascular complications.
Is excessive generalized and visceral adiposity associated with a higher prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in Caucasian patients with type 2 diabetes?
Cross-Sectional (n=769)
No
Is excessive generalized and visceral adiposity associated with a higher prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in Caucasian patients with type 2 diabetes?
Odds Ratio: 0.58 (95% CI 0.34–0.96)
p-value: p=0.03
In Caucasian patients with type 2 diabetes, increased generalized and abdominal adiposity is associated with a higher prevalence of diabetic retinopathy, particularly in females.
Adiposity measures should not yet guide DR risk stratification in T2D; leaves open visceral fat as a modifiable factor.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D) has heterogeneous clinical phenotypes related to different risk of developing diabetes complications. We investigated the correlation between generalized and abdominal adiposity and the prevalence of both micro- and macrovascular complications in Caucasian patients with T2D. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated 769 individuals with T2D consecutively referred to our diabetes center. Body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist to hip (W/H) ratio, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, lipid profile, smoking habit, diabetes therapy, and micro- and macrovascular complications were recorded. Patients were divided into three groups based on BMI and WC: non-obese with normal WC (nWC, n = 220), non-obese with excess of abdominal fat (AF, n = 260) and obese (Ob, n = 289). We found that nWC, compared with AF and Ob individuals, were predominantly males (p<0.01), had lower HbA1c (p<0.01), diastolic blood pressure (p<0.01), triglycerides (p<0.01), and showed a significantly lower prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) (p = 0.01). The rate of proliferative DR was significantly higher in Ob (13.2 %) compared to the other groups (p = 0.03). Multivariate analyses showed a significantly decreased prevalence of DR in nWC compared to both AF (OR 0.58, 95 CI 0.34-0.96; p = 0.03) and Ob (OR 0.57, 95 CI 0.33-0.98; p = 0.04) individuals. Conversely, DR was associated, mainly in women, to higher WC and W/H ratio. The prevalence of the other diabetes-related complications was similar among the studied groups. CONCLUSIONS: In our population, nWC subjects showed a lower prevalence of DR. An increased generalized and abdominal adiposity was associated to a higher prevalence of DR, especially among females.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tumminia et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (n=769). Normal waist circumference without obesity vs. Excess abdominal fat was evaluated on Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.34-0.96, p=0.03). Normal waist circumference without obesity was associated with a decreased prevalence of diabetic retinopathy compared to having excess abdominal fat (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.34-0.96; p=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: