Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The covalent addition of methylgroups to cytosine has become the most intensively researched epigenetic DNA marker. The vast majority of technologies used for DNA methylation analysis rely on a chemical reaction, the so-called 'bisulfite treatment', which introduces methylation-dependent sequence changes through selective chemical conversion of non-methylated cytosine to uracil. After treatment, all non-methylated cytosine bases are converted to uracil but all methylated cytosine bases remain cytosine. These methylation dependent C-to-T changes can subsequently be studied using conventional DNA analysis technologies. The bisulfite conversion protocol is susceptible to processing errors, and small deviation from the protocol can result in failure of the treatment. Several attempts have been made to simplify the procedure and increase its robustness. Although significant achievements in this area have been made, bisulfite treatment remains the main source of process variability in the analysis of DNA methylation. This variability in particular impairs assays, which strive for the quantitative assessment of DNA methylation. Here we present basic mathematical considerations, which should be taken into account when analyzing DNA methylation. We also introduce a PCR-based assay, which allows ab initio assessment of the DNA quality after bisulfite treatment and can help to prevent inaccurate quantitative measurement resulting from poor bisulfite treatment.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mathias Ehrich
CCP Technologies (United States)
Scott Zoll
Ionis Pharmaceuticals (United States)
Sudipto Sur
California Institute of Technology
Nucleic Acids Research
Sequenom (United States)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ehrich et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a218fa3153b2036cbf1d85e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl1134
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: