Key result
Diabetes shows no significant difference in common carotid artery diameter compared to healthy controls.
Why the study?
Common carotid artery luminal diameter is a biomarker of carotid atherosclerosis, but data in subjects with diabetes mellitus in the study locality were limited.
Does type 2 diabetes mellitus increase common carotid artery luminal diameter compared to healthy controls in adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=226)
No
Does type 2 diabetes mellitus increase common carotid artery luminal diameter compared to healthy controls in adults?
Adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus have a non-significantly larger common carotid artery luminal diameter compared to healthy controls, though age positively correlates with diameter in diabetic males.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Non-significant carotid diameter difference in diabetes warrants no practice change; leaves open association for larger studies.
Background: Common carotid artery luminal diameter (CCALD) is used in epidemiological and interventional studies as biomarker of carotid atherosclerosis especially in subjects with DM. However, there are paucity of studies on the CCALD in subjects with DM in the study locality. Purpose: This study is aimed at evaluating the CCALD in adults with DM differ from those of healthy controls Methodology: Common carotid artery luminal diameters (CCALD) of 82 adult subjects with DM and 144 healthy controls were evaluated using a high-resolution ultrasound machine (Venue 50) equipped with electronic callipers and a linear array, high-frequency transducer (7-12 mHz). Measurements were taken at a point 1 cm distal to the carotid bulb. Results: The overall mean CCALD was 6.12±1.47 mm and 5.88±0.77 mm for subjects with DM and healthy controls, respectively. The mean CCALD value is higher in subjects with DM compared to those of healthy controls though; there was no statistically significant difference in CCALD between the two groups. There were significant positive correlations between CCALD and age in male subjects with DM (r=0.488) while weak negative correlation exists in females (r=-0.073).Furthermore, weak negative correlation between CCALD and age among healthy controls (r=-0.117 and -0.020 for males and females, respectively). Conclusion: The overall mean CCALD value in subjects with DM is higher than those of healthy control. The mean CCALD value is positively and significantly related to age in only male subjects with DM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ali et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (n=226). Type 2 diabetes mellitus vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Mean common carotid artery luminal diameter (CCALD) in mm (p=0.133). The mean common carotid artery luminal diameter was higher in subjects with diabetes mellitus compared to healthy controls, but the difference was not significant.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: