Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The comparative performance is studied of different message passing system designs experimentally on a shared memory Encore Multimax multiprocessor. The systems are measured both by benchmarks and by running example parallel applications. To act as a control, the shared memory machine results are compared with the performance of the benchmarks and applications on the Intel iPSC/2 running the NX/2 operating system. The design alternatives considered are buffering, buffer organization, reference and value semantics, synchronization, coordination strategy and the location of the system in user or kernel space. The results include measurements of the effects of the design alternatives, memory caching, message sizes and copying.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Islam et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: