Key result
Right ventricular septal pacing was associated with significantly lesser blood pressure variation during upright posture compared with apical pacing during VVI mode (P=0.017).
Why the study?
Does right ventricular septal pacing reduce blood pressure variation in upright posture compared to apical pacing in pacemaker patients with advanced or complete AV block?
Cohort (n=24)
Does right ventricular septal pacing reduce blood pressure variation in upright posture compared to apical pacing in pacemaker patients with advanced or complete AV block?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Right ventricular septal pacing is associated with less blood pressure variation during upright posture compared to apical pacing in VVI mode, which may have implications for reducing pacemaker syndrome.
AIMS: Large variations in blood pressure (BP) in the upright position are a major cause of pacemaker syndrome, observed in up to 80% of patients paced non-physiologically at the right ventricular (RV) apex. We hypothesized that the magnitude of BP variations might be influenced by the RV pacing site. To assess this, we compared haemodynamic findings during supine and upright posture with RV apical vs. septal pacing. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population comprised a retrospective cohort of 24 dual-chamber pacemaker patients with advanced or complete atrioventricular block, in which 11 were randomly chosen from those with RV apical pacing, and 13 randomly chosen from those with septal pacing. Studies were performed during fixed rate VVI and DDD pacing modes with patients in both supine and passive head-up tilt positions. Continuous BP, stroke volume, cardiac index, and total peripheral resistance index were measured non-invasively. During RV apical pacing, there were significant differences of beat-to-beat BP variation after movement from supine to upright posture for both VVI and DDD pacing modes (P < 0.05); however, this was not the case for either mode during RV septal pacing. Further, comparing RV apical to RV septal pacing in the supine position, there were no BP variation differences for either DDD or VVI modes. Conversely, in the upright position BP variation was significantly greater during RV apical vs. RV septal VVI pacing (P = 0.017) but not during DDD pacing. CONCLUSION: During VVI pacing, RV septal pacing exhibited lesser BP variation during upright posture compared with RV apical pacing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kohno et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Advanced or complete atrioventricular block requiring dual-chamber pacemaker (n=24). Right ventricular septal pacing vs. Right ventricular apical pacing was evaluated on Blood pressure variation in upright posture (p=0.017). Right ventricular septal pacing was associated with significantly lesser blood pressure variation during upright posture compared with apical pacing during VVI mode (P=0.017).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: