Key result
Exaggerated hypertensive response to exercise is linked to lower GLS, indicating subclinical cardiac damage.
Why the study?
An exaggerated hypertensive response during exercise is linked to increased cardiovascular risk and mortality, but structural and functional cardiac changes and subclinical myocardial damage needed assessment.
Does an exaggerated hypertensive response during exercise indicate subclinical myocardial damage and altered left ventricular geometry in normotensive individuals?
Case-Control (n=86)
Single-blind (echocardiography operators)
No
Does an exaggerated hypertensive response during exercise indicate subclinical myocardial damage and altered left ventricular geometry in normotensive individuals?
An exaggerated hypertensive response to exercise in otherwise healthy, normotensive individuals is associated with subclinical left ventricular dysfunction and altered geometry, highlighting the need for closer cardiovascular monitoring.
Exaggerated exercise BP response may mark subclinical LV dysfunction in normotensives; hypothesis-generating for prospective outcome studies.
BACKGROUND: An exaggerated hypertensive response (EHR) during exercise is linked to increased cardiovascular risk and mortality. This study aims to assess structural and functional cardiac changes, along with subclinical myocardial damage, using transthoracic echocardiography (ECHO) and 2D longitudinal strain analysis in patients showing a hypertensive response to treadmill exercise. METHODS: Patients without known chronic diseases, presenting to the Cardiology Department at Health Sciences University Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, were divided into 2 groups based on their blood pressure response during treadmill exercise: exaggerated hypertensive response (EHR, n = 42) and normal response (control, n = 44). Left ventricular longitudinal strain was assessed using transthoracic echocardiography, and global longitudinal strain (GLS) was calculated as the average from all segments. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 26. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the groups regarding baseline demographic and laboratory parameters (P > .05 for all). However, the EHR group exhibited significantly higher interventricular septum thickness, mitral A velocity, and mitral annulus velocity (a'), while mitral annulus velocity (e') was significantly lower (P < .05 for all). Additionally, left ventricular (LV) mass index, left atrial volume index, mitral E/e' ratio, deceleration time, and relative wall thickness (RWT) were higher in the EHR group, while the mitral E/A ratio was lower (P < .05 for all). The GLS was also significantly lower in the EHR group (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Left ventricular geometry parameters, such as LV mass index and RWT, and GLS findings indicating subclinical cardiac damage, were significantly altered in the EHR group, suggesting a higher risk of LV hypertrophy and myocardial dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muhammet Geneş (2024) conducted a case-control in Exaggerated hypertensive response to exercise (n=86). Exaggerated hypertensive response (EHR) to exercise vs. Normal blood pressure response to exercise was evaluated on Global longitudinal strain (GLS) (p=0.001). Normotensive individuals with an exaggerated hypertensive response to exercise exhibited significantly lower global longitudinal strain compared to controls (-18.89% vs -22.32%, p=0.001), indicating subclinical cardiac damage.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: