Do plant traits retrieved from a database accurately predict on‐site measurements?

Summary Trait‐based approaches are increasingly used to obtain an insight into the functional aspects of plant communities. Since measuring traits can be time‐consuming, large international databases of plant traits are being compiled to share the effort. From these databases, average trait values are often extracted per species by averaging trait values of individuals over multiple populations and habitats. However, the accuracy of such aggregated information from regional databases as a surrogate for on‐site measurements has seldom been tested. For the local species pool (aggregated at the habitat‐level) and the plant communities on the plots (aggregated at the community‐level), we quantified how accurately trait values for each species measured at the plot (plot scale) and those averaged per species and site (site scale) can be estimated from those retrieved from a North‐west‐European trait database. We analysed three widely used plant traits, canopy height ( CH ), leaf dry matter content ( LDMC ) and specific leaf area ( SLA ), of species occurring in a wet meadow and a salt marsh. Database values more accurately predicted traits aggregated at the habitat‐level than those aggregated at the community‐level. In addition, traits with lower plasticity, such as LDMC , were more accurately predicted by database values. The performance of database values also depended upon the habitat studied, for example, habitat‐level SLA values were accurately predicted by database values in the wet meadow but inaccurately predicted in the salt marsh. Synthesis . This study reveals that the accuracy of traits retrieved from a database depends on the level of aggregation (lower at community‐level), the trait (lower in plastic traits) and the habitat type (lower in extreme habitats). For studies focussing on processes mainly acting at the site scale (e.g. trait–environment relationships), traits retrieved from a regional database and filtered according to habitat will probably lead to good results. Whereas studying processes acting at the plot scale (e.g. niche partitioning), requires the additional effort of measuring traits on‐site.