Key result
The interleaved T2prep-IR sequence significantly improved myocardium-to-blood contrast-to-noise ratio to 28.4 compared to 15.4 for iT2prep and 15.3 for DIR techniques.
Why the study?
Existing 3D flow-insensitive imaging for simultaneous lumen and wall visualization required subject-dependent weighted subtraction to completely null arterial blood signal.
Does the iT2prep-IR MRI sequence improve blood nulling and wall visualization compared to DIR and iT2prep in healthy subjects and congenital heart disease patients?
Does the iT2prep-IR MRI sequence improve blood nulling and wall visualization compared to DIR and iT2prep in healthy subjects and congenital heart disease patients?
The proposed interleaved T2prep-IR sequence enables simultaneous lumen and wall visualization of cardiac structures with improved blood nulling and contrast compared to conventional techniques.
May enhance cardiac MRI blood nulling and wall visualization; hypothesis-generating pending larger validation studies.
Purpose To develop a motion‐corrected 3D flow‐insensitive imaging approach interleaved T 2 prepared‐inversion recovery (iT 2 prep‐IR) for simultaneous lumen and wall visualization of the great thoracic vessels and cardiac structures. Methods A 3D flow‐insensitive approach for simultaneous cardiovascular lumen and wall visualization (iT 2 prep) has been previously proposed. This approach requires subject‐dependent weighted subtraction to completely null the arterial blood signal in the black‐blood volume. Here, we propose an (T 2 prep‐IR) approach to improve wall visualization and remove need for weighted subtraction. The proposed sequence is based on the acquisition and direct subtraction of 2 interleaved 3D whole‐heart data sets acquired with and without T 2 prep‐IR preparation. Image navigators are acquired before data acquisition to enable 2D translational and 3D non‐rigid motion correction allowing 100% respiratory scan efficiency. The proposed approach was evaluated in 10 healthy subjects and compared with the conventional 2D double inversion recovery (DIR) sequence and the 3D iT 2 prep sequence. Additionally, 5 patients with congenital heart disease were acquired to test the clinical feasibility of the proposed approach. Results The proposed iT 2 prep‐IR sequence showed improved blood nulling compared to both DIR and iT 2 prep techniques in terms of SNR (SNR blood = 6.9, 12.2, and 18.2, respectively) and contrast‐to‐noise‐ratio (CNR myoc‐blood = 28.4, 15.4, and 15.3, respectively). No statistical difference was observed between iT 2 prep‐IR, iT 2 prep and DIR atrial and ventricular wall thickness quantification. Conclusion The proposed interleaved T 2 prep‐IR sequence enables the simultaneous lumen and wall visualization of cardiac structures and shows promising results in terms of SNR, CNR, and wall thickness measurement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Milotta et al. (2019) studied Healthy and congenital heart disease (n=15). Interleaved T2prep-IR sequence vs. iT2prep and DIR sequences was evaluated on Myocardium-to-blood contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) (p=<0.05). The interleaved T2prep-IR sequence significantly improved myocardium-to-blood contrast-to-noise ratio to 28.4 compared to 15.4 for iT2prep and 15.3 for DIR techniques.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: