Key result
Cardiovascular risk charts and guidelines provide essential tools for stratifying global cardiovascular risk and guiding appropriate preventive interventions in clinical practice.
This review provides a synthesis of cardiovascular risk charts and guidelines to help clinicians stratify global cardiovascular risk and implement appropriate preventive therapies.
Supports routine risk stratification in prevention; synthesis extends prior reviews yet leaves optimal chart selection open.
Despite the wide improvement of diagnostic techniques and the introduction of effective pharmacological and instrumental therapeutic strategies aimed to the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, their incidence and lethality are still elevated, with economic implications increasingly less sustainable by the public medical systems. The modern practice of cardiovascular prevention requires, thus, that diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, both at population level and on the single patient, should be more and more precise, effective, and appropriate. From this point of view, a correct global cardiovascular risk stratification assumes a preponderant relevance, in order to allow an adequate therapeutical response. For this purpose several work instruments, as risk charts and guidelines, namely dedicated to arterial hypertension and dyslipidemias, were developed and offered to clinicians interested in cardiovascular prevention. The aim of this review is to illustrate, in synthesis, those instruments, aiming to facilitate their implementation, thus reducing the actual gap between theoretical indications and the real world.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Castelló et al. (2016) conducted a review in Cardiovascular risk, dyslipidemia, hypertension. Cardiovascular risk charts and guidelines was evaluated. Cardiovascular risk charts and guidelines provide essential tools for stratifying global cardiovascular risk and guiding appropriate preventive interventions in clinical practice.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: