Key result
Greater attitude familiarity between spouses was associated with better interpersonal functioning and lower overall ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure.
Why the study?
Is attitude familiarity associated with better interpersonal functioning and lower ambulatory blood pressure in married couples?
Observational (n=94)
Is attitude familiarity associated with better interpersonal functioning and lower ambulatory blood pressure in married couples?
Familiarity with a spouse's attitudes may be an important psychosocial factor associated with lower ambulatory blood pressure and better interpersonal functioning.
BACKGROUND: Relationships have been linked to significant physical health outcomes. However, little is known about the more specific processes that might be responsible for such links. PURPOSE: The main aim of this study was to examine a previously unexplored and potentially important form of partner knowledge (i.e., attitude familiarity) on relationship processes and cardiovascular function. METHODS: In this study, 47 married couples completed an attitude familiarity questionnaire and ambulatory assessments of daily spousal interactions and blood pressure. RESULTS: Attitude familiarity was associated with better interpersonal functioning between spouses in daily life (e.g., greater partner responsiveness). Importantly, attitude familiarity was also related to lower overall ambulatory systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that familiarity with a spouse's attitudes may be an important factor linking relationships to better interpersonal and physical health outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sanbonmatsu et al. (2010) reported an observational. Attitude familiarity was evaluated on Interpersonal functioning and ambulatory blood pressure. Greater attitude familiarity between spouses was associated with better interpersonal functioning and lower overall ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: