Key result
Invasive management significantly reduced in-hospital mortality compared to conservative treatment in patients aged 90 years and older with STEMI (17.4% vs 48.1%, p=0.009).
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of an invasive approach in patients with STEMI aged 90 years and older.
Does invasive management (primary PCI) reduce mortality compared to conservative treatment in patients with STEMI aged 90 years and older?
Cohort (n=104)
No
Does invasive management (primary PCI) reduce mortality compared to conservative treatment in patients with STEMI aged 90 years and older?
An invasive management strategy for STEMI patients aged 90 years and older is associated with significantly reduced in-hospital and 1-year overall mortality compared to conservative treatment, supporting the use of primary PCI in this demographic.
Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of an invasive approach in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) aged 90 years and older. Material and methods . This retrospective single-center study was conducted at the V. P. Polyakov Samara Regional Clinical Cardiology Dispensary. In 20132020, 104 patients aged 90 years and older were hospitalized with a diagnosis of STEMI. The mean age of patients was 91,7 years (90-100), while the proportion of women was 67,3%. Patients included in the analysis were divided into groups of conservative treatment (n=81, mean age, 91,9 (90-100) years, women 70,4%) and invasive management (coronary angiography + percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)) (n=23, mean age, 91,0 (90-94) years, women, 56,5%). Results. The groups were comparable in basic characteristics. In-hospital mortality in the conservative strategy group was 48,1% vs 17,4% in the invasive management group (p=0,009; odds ratio (OR) 3,35; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1,23-9,15). During the first year after discharge, 25,9% (n=21) died in the conservative strategy group and 30,4% (n=7) in the invasive strategy group (p=0,79; OR 0,85; 95% CI 0,42-1,75). In total (during the hospitalization period and within 1 year after discharge), 60 people (74,1%) died in the conservative strategy group, while in the invasive treatment group — 11 (47,8%) (p=0,02; OR 3,11; 95% CI 1,19-8,11). Life expectancy in patients with STEMI aged 90 years and older after discharge from hospital was 83,95 days for the conservative strategy group and 103,85 days for the invasive strategy group (p=0,67). Conclusion. The data obtained in our study support primary PCI as a treatment strategy for patients with STEMI aged 90 years and older.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duplyakova et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=104). Invasive management (coronary angiography + PCI) vs. Conservative treatment was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (OR 3.35, 95% CI 1.23-9.15, p=0.009). Invasive management significantly reduced in-hospital mortality compared to conservative treatment in patients aged 90 years and older with STEMI (17.4% vs 48.1%, p=0.009).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: