Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review analyzes UK policy on sexualisation, highlighting implications for youth rights and state responsibilities.
In recent years, the ‘sexualisation of childhood’ has moved into the centre ground of public policy and debate internationally, despite the conceptual confusions and inadequate evidence surrounding the processes denoted by the term. This paper focuses primarily on the most recent of several UK government‐commissioned reviews and reports, the B ailey R eview of 2011, warning that its proposals may amplify the voices of organised campaign groups at the expense of young people's, potentially damaging their rights to sexual self‐expression and information. In addition, however, it argues that we should attend to how the R eview delineates boundaries between the personal, the social and the political and between the public and private, to understand the kind of contract between state and citizen that policy on ‘sexualisation’ attempts to put in place.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sara Bragg (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: