Key result
Apical level systolic eccentricity index correlated better with chronic pulmonary hypertension severity (r=-0.843, P<0.0001) than traditional papillary muscle level measurement.
Why the study?
Does apical level systolic eccentricity index better correlate with right ventricular compromise compared to traditional papillary muscle level measurement in patients with chronic pulmonary hypertension?
Cross-Sectional (n=50)
Does apical level systolic eccentricity index better correlate with right ventricular compromise compared to traditional papillary muscle level measurement in patients with chronic pulmonary hypertension?
Apical level systolic eccentricity index is superior to traditional papillary muscle level measurement for correlating with worsening pulmonary hypertension severity and right ventricular dysfunction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Apical eccentricity index may enhance RV assessment in chronic PH; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Systolic eccentricity index (sEI) has been traditionally measured at the papillary muscle (PM) level. However, this measurement does not take into account the remodeling that occurs in the right ventricle (RV) during chronic pulmonary hypertension (cPH). METHODS: Standard echocardiographic data were collected on 50 patients (age 58 + or - 14 years) with known cPH (74 + or - 22 mmHg; range 45-120 mmHg) who had adequate short-axis views at the mitral valve (MV), PM, and apical (AP) levels to measure sEI. All had a normal left ventricular ejection fraction (72 + or - 10%). RESULTS: In a multivariate analysis, the traditional PM level sEI correlated the best with cPH when pulmonary artery systolic pressures (PASP) ranged between 45 and 60 mmHg (r =-0.569, P < 0.001) while AP level sEI was better when all patients were included in the analysis (r =-0.843, P < 0.0001). Not only was AP level sEI the only echo variable helpful in identifying a dilated end diastolic RV area (r =-0.730, P < 0.0001) but also patients with worse RV systolic performance (r = 0.686, P < 0.0001). MV level sEI was not better than PM level sEI. CONCLUSIONS: AP level sEI appears to be superior to traditional PM level sEI measurement as it correlates better with worsening PH severity, RV cavity dilation and RV systolic dysfunction. Further studies are now required to prospectively study how these septal abnormalities in cPH may affect RV as well as LV systolic and diastolic function. (Echocardiography 2010;27:534-538).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
López‐Candales et al. (2010) conducted a cross-sectional in Chronic pulmonary hypertension (n=50). Apical level systolic eccentricity index (sEI) vs. Papillary muscle level sEI was evaluated on Correlation with chronic pulmonary hypertension severity (r = -0.843, p=< 0.0001). Apical level systolic eccentricity index correlated better with chronic pulmonary hypertension severity (r=-0.843, P<0.0001) than traditional papillary muscle level measurement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: