Key result
Septal flattening angle (SFA) and eccentricity index (EIs) significantly correlated with RVSP/SBP, with SFA providing 84% sensitivity and 95% specificity for predicting RVSP/SBP ≥50%.
Why the study?
Do quantitative measures of ventricular septal flattening (SFA and EIs) accurately estimate right ventricular systolic pressure in pediatric patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=108)
Do quantitative measures of ventricular septal flattening (SFA and EIs) accurately estimate right ventricular systolic pressure in pediatric patients?
Septal flattening angle and eccentricity index are reliable quantitative echocardiographic measures that correlate well with right ventricular systolic pressure in pediatric patients, offering a useful alternative when TR Doppler signals are inadequate.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid noninvasive RVSP estimation; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Qualitative assessment of ventricular septal flattening is commonly used in pediatric patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) who lack adequate tricuspid regurgitation (TR) Doppler signal. We sought to determine the relation between quantitative measures of septal flattening including the eccentricity index (EIs) and a novel marker, the septal flattening angle (SFA) with right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP). METHODS: Subjects (≤18 years) with an anatomically normal heart, an adequate TR signal to obtain a peak velocity, and a simultaneous systemic systolic blood pressure (SBP) was included. RVSP was derived using TR gradient. Eccentricity index (EIs) and the SFA in systole were measured offline and correlated with RVSP/SBP. RESULTS: Of the 108 subjects, RVSP/SBP was < 50% in 77 and ≥ 50% in 31. In those with RVSP/SBP ≥50%, the median SFA was significantly lower (7.4° vs. 22°, p < 0.0001), and the median EIs was higher (1.61 vs. 1.07, p < 0.0001). SFA and EIs had a significant correlation with RVSP/SBP (rs = -0.70 and 0.61, respectively). Area under the curve was higher for SFA compared to EIs (0.92 and 0.85, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity of SFA for predicting an RVSP/SBP ≥ 50% using a cut point of 16° was 84% and 95% and for an EIs cut point of 1.35 was 74.2% and 96.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Septal flattening angle and EIs are quantitative measures of ventricular septal flattening that correlate well with RVSP/SBP and should be considered more routinely in clinical practice, especially in patients with inadequate TR Doppler signal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watson et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Pulmonary hypertension (n=108). Septal flattening angle (SFA) and Eccentricity index (EIs) was evaluated on Correlation with RVSP/SBP and prediction of RVSP/SBP ≥ 50% (rs = -0.70 for SFA; rs = 0.61 for EIs, p=< 0.0001). Septal flattening angle (SFA) and eccentricity index (EIs) significantly correlated with RVSP/SBP, with SFA providing 84% sensitivity and 95% specificity for predicting RVSP/SBP ≥50%.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: