Why the study?
Does advanced age increase mortality risk in patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators?
Does advanced age increase mortality risk in patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators?
Advanced age at the time of ICD implantation is strongly and independently associated with increased total, cardiac, and non-cardiac mortality, highlighting the need to consider age and comorbidities when anticipating survival.
May inform age-comorbidity assessment for ICD candidacy; leaves open prospective trials of selection criteria.
AIMS: Given the selectivity of clinical trial patients and meager representation of elderly in the major implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) randomized trials (<25%), whether such data apply to elderly patients overall is unclear. The purpose of our study is to understand the influence of age on mortality after ICD implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 502 consecutive patients receiving ICDs from 1993 to 2003 at a single university hospital. The primary predictor was patient age, categorized as <65, 65-75, and >75 years at ICD implantation. The primary outcome was time to death. Mean follow-up was 4 years. Median survival after ICD implantation was 5.3 years among subjects >75 years, less than half that of the youngest group. After adjusting for potential confounders, compared with subjects <65 years of age, patients >75 years [hazard ratio (HR), 4.7; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.8-7.9; P < 0.001] and those 65-75 years (HR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.7-4.8; P < 0.001) were at greater risk of death. Increased age was associated with higher total, cardiac, and non-cardiac mortality (all P <or= 0.001). CONCLUSION: Age at ICD implantation is strongly and independently associated with mortality. Age should be considered among potential co-morbidities in anticipating survival of the elderly patient prior to ICD implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pellegrini et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: