Key result
Filipina women had no excess of extensive or moderate coronary artery calcium compared to white women, despite a higher prevalence of metabolic risk factors.
Why the study?
Does Filipino ethnicity compared to white ethnicity affect the prevalence of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis in asymptomatic women?
Cross-Sectional (n=377)
Does Filipino ethnicity compared to white ethnicity affect the prevalence of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis in asymptomatic women?
Despite a higher prevalence of metabolic risk factors, asymptomatic Filipino women do not have an excess of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis compared to white women.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports similar CAC thresholds for Filipina and white women; leaves open prospective validation of ethnicity-specific risk.
BACKGROUND: Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Electron-beam computed tomography (EBCT) detects coronary artery calcium (CAC), a marker of atherosclerotic plaque. Few studies have described EBCT-defined CHD among ethnic minorities with elevated T2DM prevalence. The objective of this study was to compare EBCT-defined CAC in Filipino and white women without known cardiovascular disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: Subjects were participants aged 55 to 78 years in the Rancho Bernardo Study (n=196) and the University of California at San Diego's Filipino Women's Health Study (n=181). Glucose, blood pressure, lipids, anthropometric measurements, and lifestyle factors were measured from 1995 to 1999. EBCT-defined CAC scores, visceral and subcutaneous fat, and statin use were assessed in 2001 to 2002. Compared with whites, Filipinas had a significantly higher prevalence of T2DM (32.6% versus 6.1%, P<0.001) and the metabolic syndrome (32.6% versus 13.8, P<0.001). Filipinas were younger (64.4 versus 66.7 years), had higher triglyceride levels (155 versus 135 mg/dL), had a higher ratio of total cholesterol to HDL cholesterol (4.3 versus 3.5), more frequently used statins (31% versus 19%), and had more visceral fat (69.4 versus 62.1 cm3) and lower HDL cholesterol levels (54 versus 66 mg/dL) than whites. Exercise frequency, body mass index, and waist girth did not differ by ethnicity. Nevertheless, extensive (CAC score > or =400; 9% versus 9%) and moderate (CAC score 150 to 399; 13% versus 11%) atherosclerotic plaque did not differ by ethnicity, even after adjustment for age, T2DM, hypertension, estrogen use, statin use, smoking, lipids, and visceral fat. CONCLUSIONS: Filipinas had no excess of subclinical atherosclerosis despite their significantly higher prevalence of T2DM, the metabolic syndrome, hypertension, and visceral adiposity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Araneta et al. (2004) conducted a cross-sectional in Subclinical Coronary Atherosclerosis (n=377). Filipino ethnicity vs. White ethnicity was evaluated on Extensive atherosclerotic plaque (CAC score ≥400). Filipina women had no excess of extensive or moderate coronary artery calcium compared to white women, despite a higher prevalence of metabolic risk factors.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: