Key result
Prehospital fibrinolysis improves AMI outcomes when timely PCI is unavailable within two hours.
Why the study?
Acute myocardial infarction requires appropriate timely reperfusion therapy, prompting a summary of evidence on the administration of prehospital fibrinolysis and its impact on patient outcomes.
Does prehospital fibrinolysis therapy improve outcomes and decrease mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction when timely percutaneous coronary intervention is not available?
Does prehospital fibrinolysis therapy improve outcomes and decrease mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction when timely percutaneous coronary intervention is not available?
Prehospital fibrinolysis is a crucial reperfusion strategy that reduces ischemic time and improves survival in AMI patients when timely PCI is delayed by more than two hours, aligning with current guidelines.
Supports prehospital fibrinolysis in delayed-PCI AMI settings; leaves open prospective RCTs to confirm benefits.
Acute myocardial infarction is a fatal condition. Acute myocardial infarction requires appropriate timely reperfusion therapy to improve the outcomes. Fibrinolysis and percutaneous coronary intervention are the cornerstone strategies for managing such cases. In this review, our objective is to summarize the available evidence concerning the administration of prehospital fibrinolysis and its impact on patient outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction. We conducted a comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Our search strategy included the following terms: "Prehospital," "EMS," "Emergency Medical Services," "ambulance," "Fibrinolytic Therapy," "alteplase," "streptokinase," "reteplase," "tenecteplase," "Acute Myocardial Infarction," and "patient outcomes." We found prehospital administration of fibrinolysis may improve the outcomes and decrease the mortality rate. We found that some recommendations were to use prehospital fibrinolysis only if the percutaneous coronary intervention was not accessible within two hours. Additionally, we discussed recommendations to use newer prehospital fibrinolysis as they have better efficacy and safety outcomes. In conclusion, prehospital fibrinolysis decreases the total ischemic time and improves outcomes in acute myocardial infarction patients when timely percutaneous coronary intervention is not available. The guidelines strongly recommend it when the anticipated time for percutaneous coronary intervention exceeds two hours. Ongoing research optimizes patient selection, treatment tools, and prehospital systems of care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alsomali et al. (2024) conducted a review in Acute Myocardial Infarction. Prehospital Fibrinolysis Therapy vs. In-hospital fibrinolysis or PCI was evaluated. Prehospital fibrinolysis decreases total ischemic time and improves outcomes in acute myocardial infarction patients when timely percutaneous coronary intervention is not available within two hours.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: