Key result
The presence of silent brain infarcts on pretreatment CT was not significantly associated with increased death or disability (50.6% vs 40.9%) or ICH (18.3% vs 14.0%) after stroke thrombolysis.
Why the study?
Does the presence of silent brain infarcts modify the risk of ICH or worse outcome in acute ischaemic stroke patients treated with thrombolysis?
Cohort (n=175)
No
Does the presence of silent brain infarcts modify the risk of ICH or worse outcome in acute ischaemic stroke patients treated with thrombolysis?
Absolute Event Rate: 50.6% vs 40.9%
Silent brain infarcts on pretreatment CT do not increase the risk of ICH or worsen outcomes in acute ischaemic stroke patients treated with thrombolysis, and should not preclude treatment.
Silent brain infarcts on pretreatment CT were not associated with higher ICH or disability after thrombolysis; leaves open confirmation in prospective studies.
OBJECTIVES: Silent brain infarcts (SBI) are a common finding both in stroke-free patients and in patients after a cerebrovascular incident. They are considered a risk factor for subsequent symptomatic strokes. However, their influence on outcome in stroke patients treated with thrombolysis is not established. Our aim was to identify the prevalence of SBI in acute ischaemic stroke patients undergoing routine intravenous thrombolysis and evaluate the association between their presence on pretreatment computed tomography (CT) and outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We systematically reviewed CT images and clinical records of consecutive patients treated with thrombolysis because of a first-ever stroke between 1 November 2003 and 31 July 2009 in a single stroke centre. We have analysed the frequency of SBI and their influence on outcome. RESULTS: Silent brain infarcts were present on 82/175 (47%) baseline CT scans. Patients with SBI were significantly older (74 vs 67 years), and more frequently had diabetes (19.5% vs 11.8%) and hyperlipidaemia (37.8% vs 21.5%). There were no significant differences in the ratio of ICH (18.3% vs 14.0%), 3-month mortality (24.7% vs 15.1%) and death or disability (50.6% vs 40.9%), which was also confirmed in a multivariate analysis adjusted for other clinical variables. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, SBI were not associated with increased risk of ICH nor worse outcome after treatment with rt-PA for stroke. SBI should not be considered an argument against initiating thrombolysis, but further studies are needed to fully understand their association with thrombolysis for stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kobayashi et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Acute ischaemic stroke (n=175). Silent brain infarcts (SBI) vs. Absence of silent brain infarcts was evaluated on Death or disability. The presence of silent brain infarcts on pretreatment CT was not significantly associated with increased death or disability (50.6% vs 40.9%) or ICH (18.3% vs 14.0%) after stroke thrombolysis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: