Key result
Silent brain infarction in patients with recent noncardioembolic stroke was not significantly associated with an increased risk of recurrent stroke (OR 1.42; 95% CI 0.79-2.56; P=0.24).
Why the study?
Does the presence of silent brain infarction increase the risk of recurrent stroke in patients with recent noncardioembolic stroke?
Cohort (n=1,014)
Does the presence of silent brain infarction increase the risk of recurrent stroke in patients with recent noncardioembolic stroke?
Odds Ratio: 1.42 (95% CI 0.79–2.56)
Absolute Event Rate: 13% vs 9.2%
p-value: p=0.24
The presence of silent brain infarction on MRI in patients with recent mild noncardioembolic ischemic stroke was not shown to be an independent risk factor for recurrent stroke or mortality.
Silent brain infarction should not yet inform recurrent stroke risk stratification; leaves open its prognostic value in larger prospective cohorts.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Silent brain infarctions are associated with an increased risk of stroke in healthy individuals. Risk of recurrent stroke in patients with both symptomatic and silent brain infarction (SBI) has only been investigated in patients with cardioembolic stroke in the European Atrial Fibrillation Trial. We assessed whether patients with recent noncardioembolic stroke and SBI detected on MRI are at increased risk for recurrent stroke, other cardiovascular events, and mortality. METHODS: The prevalence of SBI detected on MRI was assessed in 1014 patients enrolled in the imaging substudy of the Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes (PRoFESS) trial. The primary outcome was first recurrence of stroke in patients with both symptomatic stroke and SBI in comparison with age- and sex-matched patients with stroke without SBI. Secondary outcomes were a combined vascular end point, other vascular events, and mortality. The 2 groups were compared using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Silent brain infarction was detected in 207 (20.4%) of the 1014 patients. Twenty-seven (13.0%) patients with SBI and 19 (9.2%) without SBI had a recurrent stroke (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.79-2.56; P=0.24) during a mean follow-up of 2.5 years. Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference for all secondary outcome parameters between patients with SBI and matched patients without SBI. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of SBI in patients with recent mild noncardioembolic ischemic stroke could not be shown to be an independent risk factor for recurrent stroke, other vascular events, or a higher mortality rate. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00153062.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weber et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in recent noncardioembolic stroke (n=1,014). Silent brain infarction (SBI) vs. Age- and sex-matched patients with stroke without SBI was evaluated on first recurrence of stroke (OR 1.42, 95% CI 0.79-2.56, p=0.24). Silent brain infarction in patients with recent noncardioembolic stroke was not significantly associated with an increased risk of recurrent stroke (OR 1.42; 95% CI 0.79-2.56; P=0.24).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: