Key result
The Active Herts community-based physical activity programme significantly increased self-reported physical activity by a mean difference of 1,331 weekly METs at 12 months compared to baseline.
Why the study?
A high proportion of UK adults are inactive, leading to physical and mental health concerns, prompting a pragmatic evaluation of the Active Herts community-based physical activity programme.
Does a theoretically-driven community-based physical activity programme improve physical activity and mental wellbeing in inactive adults at risk of cardiovascular disease?
Observational (n=717)
Yes
Does a theoretically-driven community-based physical activity programme improve physical activity and mental wellbeing in inactive adults at risk of cardiovascular disease?
Mean Difference: 1331 (95% CI 1032–1631)
p-value: p=<0.001
A theoretically-driven, community-based physical activity intervention significantly increases self-reported physical activity and reduces sitting time in inactive adults at risk for cardiovascular disease.
May support community PA programs for inactive CVD-risk adults; hypothesis-generating pending RCTs.
Background: A high proportion of UK adults are inactive, which can lead to a range of physical and mental health concerns. Active Herts is a community-based physical activity programme for inactive adults at risk of cardiovascular disease and/or low mental wellbeing. This paper provides a pragmatic evaluation of this programme. Method: This longitudinal study observed 717 adults (68% female, mean age = 56.9 years) from the "Active Herts" programme. Programme users were provided with a 45-min consultation with a "Get Active Specialist," who talked them through an Active Herts self-help booklet and then signposted them to free or subsidized local exercise sessions. Programme users were followed up with a booster call 2 weeks later. The Get Active Specialist was a registered exercise professional (REPS Level 3), with additional training from the study team in motivational interviewing, health coaching, COM-B behavioral diagnosis and delivery of behavior change techniques (BCTs) in practice. The Active Herts booklet contained theoretically-driven and evidence-based BCTs to translate behavioral science into public health practice. Physical activity (Metabolic Equivalent Time [METs], measured using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), perceived health (EQ-5D-5L) and mental wellbeing (Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale: WEMWBS) were measured at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months. Results: At the end of the 12-month programme, users showed sustained improvements in physical activity (by +1331 METS), exceeding weekly recommendations. Sitting (reducing by over an hour per day), sporting participation, and perceptions of health were also improved, with improvements in mental wellbeing in the first 3 months. Conclusion: Designing and delivering a community-based physical activity programme that is theoretically-driven and evidence-based with frequent behavior change training and supervision can yield a significant increase in self-reported physical activity, reduction in sitting behavior and improvements to perceived health and mental wellbeing. Future research should extend this approach, utilizing a real-world, pragmatic evaluation. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier (NCT number): NCT03153098.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chater et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Physical inactivity with elevated risk of cardiovascular disease and/or low mental wellbeing (n=717). Active Herts physical activity programme vs. Baseline (pre-intervention) was evaluated on Change in weekly physical activity (METs) from baseline to 12 months (MD 1331, 95% CI 1032-1631, p=<0.001). The Active Herts community-based physical activity programme significantly increased self-reported physical activity by a mean difference of 1,331 weekly METs at 12 months compared to baseline.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: