PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 10, 2018BMC Public Health70 citationsOpen Access

Integrated motivational interviewing and cognitive behaviour therapy can increase physical activity and improve health of adult ambulatory care patients in a regional hospital: the Healthy4U randomised controlled trial

SBStephen BarrettSBStephen BeggPOPaul O’Halloran

Structured PICO

Does integrated motivational interviewing and cognitive behaviour therapy increase physical activity in insufficiently active adult ambulatory care patients?

P
Population
72 adults who reported being insufficiently active, recruited from an ambulatory hospital clinic
I
Intervention
Education session and eight 30-min telephone sessions of integrated motivational interviewing and cognitive behaviour therapy (MI-CBT) over 12 weeks
C
Comparator
Education session only
O
Outcome
Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity measured by ActiGraph GT3X accelerometers at post-intervention (3-months) and follow-up (6-months)surrogate

A 12-week telephone-based health coaching intervention significantly increased moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and improved anthropometric and health-related outcomes in insufficiently active ambulatory care patients.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether a twelve-week, health coaching intervention could result in changes in physical activity, anthropometrics and health-related outcomes in adults presenting to an ambulatory hospital clinic. METHODS: Seventy-two participants who reported being insufficiently active were recruited from an ambulatory hospital clinic and randomised to an intervention group that received an education session and eight 30-min telephone sessions of integrated motivational interviewing and cognitive behaviour therapy (MI-CBT), or to a control group that received the education session only. ActiGraph GT3X accelerometers were used to measure moderate-to-vigorous physical activity at baseline, post-intervention (3-months) and follow-up (6-months). Secondary outcome measures (anthropometrics, physical activity self-efficacy, health-related quality of life, type 2 diabetes risk) were also assessed at the three time points. RESULTS: , respectively. Treatment group influenced the pattern of physical activity over time (p < 0.001). The intervention group increased moderate-to-vigorous physical activity from baseline to post-intervention and remained elevated at follow-up by 12.9 min/day (95%CI: 6.5 to 19.5 min/day). In contrast, at follow-up the control group decreased moderate-to-vigorous physical activity by 9.9 min/day (95%CI: -3.7 to -16.0 min/day). Relative to control, at follow-up the intervention group exhibited beneficial changes in body mass (p < 0.001), waist circumference (p < 0.001), body mass index (p < 0.001), physical activity self-efficacy (p < 0.001), type 2 diabetes risk (p < 0.001), and health-related quality of life (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that a low contact coaching intervention results in beneficial changes in physical activity, anthropometrics and health-related outcomes that were maintained at follow-up in adults who report being insufficiently active to an ambulatory care clinic. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ANZCTR: ACTRN12616001331426 . Registered 23 September 2016.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Barrett et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8279057b6f8b3804a21b10https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6064-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper