Key result
The TEAMcare intervention increased days per week following a healthy eating plan (RR 1.2; 95% CI 1.1-1.4) and participating in physical activity (RR 1.2; 95% CI 1.1-2.0) compared to usual care.
Why the study?
Does integrated medical care management improve behavioral outcomes in adults with depression and poorly controlled diabetes and/or coronary heart disease?
RCT (n=214)
randomized
Does integrated medical care management improve behavioral outcomes in adults with depression and poorly controlled diabetes and/or coronary heart disease?
Relative Risk: 1.2 (95% CI 1.1–1.4)
An integrated medical care management intervention improved diet and physical activity behaviors in patients with depression and poorly controlled diabetes and/or coronary heart disease.
Collaborative care improves diet and activity in depressed patients with diabetes/CHD; extends prior clinical gains to behavioral targets.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to compare behavioral outcomes (physical activity, sedentary behavior, smoking cessation, diet) between the intervention and usual care conditions from the TEAMcare trial. METHODS: TEAMcare was a randomized trial among 214 adults with depression and poorly controlled diabetes and/or coronary heart disease that promoted health behavior change and pharmacotherapy to improve health. Behavioral outcomes were measured with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (physical activity, sitting time) and the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Measure (smoking, diet, exercise). Poisson regression models among completers (N=185) were conducted adjusting for age, education, smoking status and depression. RESULTS: Intervention participants had more days/week following a healthy eating plan [relative rate=1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.1-1.4] and more days of participation in 30 min of physical activity (relative rate=1.2, 95% CI=1.1-2.0) compared to usual care. Intervention participants were more likely to meet physical activity guidelines (7.5% increase) compared to usual care (12% decrease; P=.053). CONCLUSION: Diet and activity generally improved for those receiving the intervention, while there were no differences in some aspects of diet (fruit and vegetable and high-fat food intake), smoking status and sitting time between conditions in the TEAMcare trial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosenberg et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in depression and poorly controlled diabetes and/or coronary heart disease (n=214). TEAMcare intervention vs. usual care was evaluated on days/week following a healthy eating plan (RR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.4). The TEAMcare intervention increased days per week following a healthy eating plan (RR 1.2; 95% CI 1.1-1.4) and participating in physical activity (RR 1.2; 95% CI 1.1-2.0) compared to usual care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: