Key result
Implementation of evidence-based medical and device therapies for heart failure remains remarkably low in routine practice despite proven benefits in clinical trials.
Why the study?
Despite clinical trial evidence of benefit, the use of evidence-based medical and device therapies for heart failure in routine practice remains remarkably low.
How can the implementation of evidence-based therapies for heart failure be improved?
How can the implementation of evidence-based therapies for heart failure be improved?
Addressing the large gap between clinical trial efficacy and routine practice implementation of heart failure therapies is a critical public health issue.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Persistent HF therapy gaps demand targeted implementation efforts; leaves open which strategies most effectively close the trial-to-practice divide.
Treatment options for patients with heart failure have improved rapidly over the last few decades. Data from large scale clinical trials demonstrate that medical and device therapies can improve quality of life, reduce hospitalizations for acute heart failure, and reduce mortality. However, the use of many of these therapies in routine practice is remarkably low. There are many reasons for suboptimal implementation of evidence-based therapies for heart failure, and we believe addressing the large gap between what can be accomplished in clinical trials versus routine practice is a critical and urgent public health issue. In this review, we outline reasons for this implementation gap and review recent studies attempting to address this issue. We also provide recommendations for future interventions and areas of clinical investigation to improve implementation for patients with heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
DeVore et al. (2022) conducted a review in heart failure. evidence-based therapies was evaluated. Implementation of evidence-based medical and device therapies for heart failure remains remarkably low in routine practice despite proven benefits in clinical trials.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: