Key result
Fulfilling 7 guideline-based performance measures compared to 0 was associated with a decreased risk of incident atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.33-0.73; P<0.001 for trend).
Why the study?
Incident AF is an adverse prognostic indicator in HF, making the identification of modifiable targets relevant to reduce AF incidence and morbidity.
Does fulfilment of guideline-based process performance measures reduce the risk of incident atrial fibrillation in patients with newly diagnosed heart failure?
Cohort (n=25,100)
Yes
Does fulfilment of guideline-based process performance measures reduce the risk of incident atrial fibrillation in patients with newly diagnosed heart failure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Higher adherence to guideline-based heart failure performance measures is associated with a significantly reduced long-term risk of incident atrial fibrillation.
AIMS: Incident atrial fibrillation (AF) is an adverse prognostic indicator in heart failure (HF); identifying modifiable targets may be relevant to reduce the incidence and morbidity of AF. Therefore, we examined the association between quality of HF care and risk of AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the Danish Heart Failure Registry, we conducted a nationwide registry-based cohort study of all incident HF patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2018 and without history of AF. Quality of HF care was assessed by seven process performance measures, including echocardiographic examination, New York Heart Association classification, treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers, beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid antagonists, physical training, and patient education. In the main analysis, we examined adherence with all measures in a cohort of 25 100 patients (mean age 68.5 ± 13.2 years; 33.6% women). The median follow-up was 3.1 years. Cox proportional hazard regressions estimated the hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) between the number of fulfilled measures and incident AF. In a multivariable-adjusted analysis with 0 fulfilled performance measures as reference, the HRs (95% CIs) were 1: 0.78 (0.61-1.00), 2: 0.63 (0.49-0.80), 3: 0.53 (0.36-0.80), 4: 0.64 (0.44-0.94), 5: 0.56 (0.39-0.82), 6: 0.51 (0.35-0.74), and 7: 0.49 (0.33-0.73), with a significant decreasing linear trend (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with incident HF, fulfilment of guideline-based process performance measures was associated with decreased long-term risk of AF. This study supports initiatives to improve the quality of care for patients with HF to prevent incident AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vinter et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Incident heart failure (n=25,100). Fulfilment of guideline-based process performance measures vs. 0 fulfilled performance measures was evaluated on Incident atrial fibrillation (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.33-0.73, p=<0.001). Fulfilling 7 guideline-based performance measures compared to 0 was associated with a decreased risk of incident atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.33-0.73; P<0.001 for trend).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: